Will they claim that 2009 would have been warmer if it wasn't for the volcano, la Nia, solar minimum, lesser effect of co2 than previously calculated, drifting sensors, or faulty calculations?
Are global warming believers starting to develop their list of excesses already in preparation that 2009 is going to be colder than 2008?
Maybe they'll finally admit that they're wrong.
Nah, that would be too much to expect.
Johnny, what does "reinforce your denial" mean? If it doesn't get any warmer, there is nothing to deny.
They've already condemned skeptics for considering any of these factors, so I'm sure they wouldn't even consider using any of them as an excuse for their lack of ability to predict. ( Let us be sure to remind them that being able to predict an outcome is a main pillar of science.)
Toasties will will start claiming Natural variation is masking long term warming.
Interestingly though, when skeptics mention the words 'natural', they are shouted down and told to look at the science.
I'm sure you would be happy to see 2009 be cooler than 2008, as it would re-enforce your denial. 2009 is already turning out to be warmer than 2008.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment